Great idea to state what went into the vote, especially for the release votes.
/Anne On 22. feb. 2010, at 09.32, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: >> ...QA is an essential part of the voting process. Part of what people >> should be doing is saying what went into their vote. IPMC votes >> often just vet the release for legal issues, but it is expected of >> the esme devs to vet the release for quality as well.... > > +1, totally agree with that. > -Bertrand
