I don't think we should bother doing that for the public timeline. I cannot even remember last time I took a look at a public twitter timeline? (other than search)
I would go for "Older". On 7. mars 2010, at 16.46, Richard Hirsch wrote: > Do we want the same for public timeline as well? > > What should we call it "Archive"? "Older"? > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Which makes me wonder how twitter does it? >> Do they have about one month of tweets cached? >> (afaik you cannot see tweets, even replies, older than about 1 month, same >> goes for search.twitter.com) >> >> Having a separate page for older messages makes sense, would be easy to >> implement UI wise too. >> There could for instance be a link on the bottom of the message box which >> takes you to a page with old messages. >> >> >> On 7. mars 2010, at 11.41, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >>> What about shifting to another page where you can view older mesages. >>> This view isn't updated in realtime via comet but is static. >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> We are going to need paging as well - right now, it isn't possible to >>>>> view older messages >>>> >>>> True, but it wasn't possible with the old view either. What would be >>>> more difficult would be to make messages both paged and update in real >>>> time on any page. I don't think this is even desirable from >>>> performance point of view. >>>> >> >>
