@Vladimir , Ethan: Does the suggestion by Vladimir needed to be committed to the trunk or not?
D. On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Ethan Jewett <esjew...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, that's not it, but it is an error with the new user messages > timeline actor that I'll need to investigate locally and deal with. As > I mentioned, that code isn't very well tested :-( > > I guess I'll just need to spend some time investigating locally this > weekend for both these issues. > > Ethan > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> @Ethan - I found this exception on stax: >> >> I don't know if this is the one you want. >> >> D. >> >> ------------------------ >> >> lift:comet type="UserMessagesTimeline" name="user4"></lift:comet> >> ERROR - Actor threw an exception >> java.util.NoSuchElementException: key not found: 44 >> at scala.collection.MapLike$class.default(MapLike.scala:223) >> at scala.collection.immutable.HashMap.default(HashMap.scala:35) >> at scala.collection.MapLike$class.apply(MapLike.scala:134) >> at scala.collection.immutable.HashMap.apply(HashMap.scala:35) >> at >> org.apache.esme.model.Message$$anonfun$toXml$3$$anonfun$apply$10$$anonfun$apply$11.apply(Message.scala:371) >> at >> org.apache.esme.model.Message$$anonfun$toXml$3$$anonfun$apply$10$$anonfun$apply$11.apply(Message.scala:370) >> at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:129) >> at >> org.apache.esme.model.Message$$anonfun$toXml$3$$anonfun$apply$10.apply(Message.scala:370) >> at >> org.apache.esme.model.Message$$anonfun$toXml$3$$anonfun$apply$10.apply(Message.scala:368) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:631) >> at >> scala.collection.LinearSeqLike$$anon$1.foreach(LinearSeqLike.scala:52) >> at scala.collection.IterableLike$class.foreach(IterableLike.scala:79) >> at scala.xml.NodeSeq.foreach(NodeSeq.scala:43) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at scala.xml.NodeSeq.map(NodeSeq.scala:43) >> at >> org.apache.esme.model.Message$$anonfun$toXml$3.apply(Message.scala:368) >> at >> org.apache.esme.model.Message$$anonfun$toXml$3.apply(Message.scala:368) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:631) >> at >> scala.collection.LinearSeqLike$$anon$1.foreach(LinearSeqLike.scala:52) >> at scala.collection.IterableLike$class.foreach(IterableLike.scala:79) >> at scala.xml.NodeSeq.foreach(NodeSeq.scala:43) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at scala.xml.NodeSeq.map(NodeSeq.scala:43) >> at org.apache.esme.model.Message.toXml(Message.scala:368) >> at org.apache.esme.model.Message.digestedXHTML(Message.scala:384) >> at org.apache.esme.model.Message$text$.asJsExp(Message.scala:300) >> at org.apache.esme.model.Message$text$.asJsExp(Message.scala:297) >> at >> net.liftweb.mapper.BaseMappedField$class.asJs(MappedField.scala:196) >> at net.liftweb.mapper.MappedText.asJs(MappedBinary.scala:103) >> at >> net.liftweb.mapper.MetaMapper$$anonfun$43.apply(MetaMapper.scala:1266) >> at >> net.liftweb.mapper.MetaMapper$$anonfun$43.apply(MetaMapper.scala:1266) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:227) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:227) >> at >> scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized$class.foreach(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:61) >> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:45) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.flatMap(TraversableLike.scala:227) >> at scala.collection.immutable.List.flatMap(List.scala:45) >> at net.liftweb.mapper.MetaMapper$class.asJs(MetaMapper.scala:1266) >> at org.apache.esme.model.Message$.asJs(Message.scala:43) >> at net.liftweb.mapper.Mapper$class.asJs(Mapper.scala:127) >> at org.apache.esme.model.Message.asJs(Message.scala:283) >> at >> org.apache.esme.comet.Timeline$$anonfun$render$1.apply(Timeline.scala:71) >> at >> org.apache.esme.comet.Timeline$$anonfun$render$1.apply(Timeline.scala:70) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at >> scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized$class.foreach(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:61) >> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:45) >> at >> scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:206) >> at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:45) >> at org.apache.esme.comet.Timeline$class.render(Timeline.scala:70) >> at >> org.apache.esme.comet.UserMessagesTimeline.render(UserMessagesTimeline.scala:31) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$class.net$liftweb$http$CometActor$$performReRender(CometActor.scala:673) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$CometActor$$_mediumPriority$1.apply(CometActor.scala:533) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$CometActor$$_mediumPriority$1.apply(CometActor.scala:499) >> at scala.PartialFunction$$anon$1.apply(PartialFunction.scala:46) >> at scala.PartialFunction$$anon$1.apply(PartialFunction.scala:45) >> at scala.PartialFunction$$anon$1.apply(PartialFunction.scala:45) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply$mcV$sp(CometActor.scala:464) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(CometActor.scala:463) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(CometActor.scala:463) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.functionLifespan(S.scala:1418) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply$mcV$sp(CometActor.scala:463) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply(CometActor.scala:463) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply(CometActor.scala:463) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.net$liftweb$http$S$$wrapQuery(S.scala:1169) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_nest2InnerInit$1$$anonfun$apply$29.apply(S.scala:1309) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.net$liftweb$http$S$$doAround(S.scala:1106) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$doAround$1.apply(S.scala:1107) >> at >> net.liftweb.mapper.MetaProtoExtendedSession$myWrapper$.apply(ProtoExtendedSession.scala:81) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.net$liftweb$http$S$$doAround(S.scala:1107) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_nest2InnerInit$1.apply(S.scala:1307) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$.net$liftweb$http$S$$_nest2InnerInit(S.scala:1306) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_innerInit$1$$anonfun$apply$31$$anonfun$apply$32$$anonfun$apply$33$$anonfun$apply$34.apply(S.scala:1332) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.withReq(S.scala:1341) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_innerInit$1$$anonfun$apply$31$$anonfun$apply$32$$anonfun$apply$33.apply(S.scala:1331) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_innerInit$1$$anonfun$apply$31$$anonfun$apply$32.apply(S.scala:1330) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_innerInit$1$$anonfun$apply$31.apply(S.scala:1329) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_innerInit$1.apply(S.scala:1328) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.net$liftweb$http$S$$_innerInit(S.scala:1327) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_init$1$$anonfun$apply$41$$anonfun$apply$42$$anonfun$apply$43$$anonfun$apply$44$$anonfun$apply$45.apply(S.scala:1381) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_init$1$$anonfun$apply$41$$anonfun$apply$42$$anonfun$apply$43$$anonfun$apply$44.apply(S.scala:1379) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$$anonfun$apply$12$$anonfun$apply$13$$anonfun$apply$14$$anonfun$apply$15.apply(Vars.scala:530) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$$anonfun$apply$12$$anonfun$apply$13$$anonfun$apply$14.apply(Vars.scala:529) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$$anonfun$apply$12$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(Vars.scala:528) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$$anonfun$apply$12.apply(Vars.scala:527) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$class.apply(Vars.scala:526) >> at net.liftweb.http.RequestVarHandler$.apply(Vars.scala:445) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_init$1$$anonfun$apply$41$$anonfun$apply$42$$anonfun$apply$43.apply(S.scala:1378) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$$anonfun$apply$12$$anonfun$apply$13$$anonfun$apply$14$$anonfun$apply$15.apply(Vars.scala:530) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$$anonfun$apply$12$$anonfun$apply$13$$anonfun$apply$14.apply(Vars.scala:529) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$$anonfun$apply$12$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(Vars.scala:528) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$$anonfun$apply$12.apply(Vars.scala:527) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at net.liftweb.http.CoreRequestVarHandler$class.apply(Vars.scala:526) >> at net.liftweb.http.TransientRequestVarHandler$.apply(Vars.scala:449) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_init$1$$anonfun$apply$41$$anonfun$apply$42.apply(S.scala:1377) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_init$1$$anonfun$apply$41.apply(S.scala:1376) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.S$$anonfun$net$liftweb$http$S$$_init$1.apply(S.scala:1375) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.net$liftweb$http$S$$_init(S.scala:1374) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.init(S.scala:991) >> at net.liftweb.http.S$.initIfUninitted(S.scala:1749) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply$mcV$sp(CometActor.scala:462) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(CometActor.scala:462) >> at >> net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(CometActor.scala:462) >> at net.liftweb.util.ThreadGlobal.doWith(ThreadGlobal.scala:71) >> at net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1.apply(CometActor.scala:461) >> at net.liftweb.http.CometActor$$anon$1.apply(CometActor.scala:459) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.LiftActor$class.execTranslate(LiftActor.scala:371) >> at >> org.apache.esme.comet.UserMessagesTimeline.execTranslate(UserMessagesTimeline.scala:31) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.SpecializedLiftActor$class.net$liftweb$actor$SpecializedLiftActor$$proc2(LiftActor.scala:261) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.SpecializedLiftActor$$anonfun$net$liftweb$actor$SpecializedLiftActor$$processMailbox$1.apply$mcV$sp(LiftActor.scala:182) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.SpecializedLiftActor$$anonfun$net$liftweb$actor$SpecializedLiftActor$$processMailbox$1.apply(LiftActor.scala:182) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.SpecializedLiftActor$$anonfun$net$liftweb$actor$SpecializedLiftActor$$processMailbox$1.apply(LiftActor.scala:182) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.SpecializedLiftActor$class.around(LiftActor.scala:196) >> at >> org.apache.esme.comet.UserMessagesTimeline.around(UserMessagesTimeline.scala:31) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.SpecializedLiftActor$class.net$liftweb$actor$SpecializedLiftActor$$processMailbox(LiftActor.scala:181) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.SpecializedLiftActor$$anonfun$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply$mcV$sp(LiftActor.scala:145) >> at >> net.liftweb.actor.LAScheduler$$anonfun$9$$anon$1$$anon$2.run(LiftActor.scala:51) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) >> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjew...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> There is a potential problem with actions. I created some new Jira >>> items that should be pulled in by my RSS pull action that runs every 5 >>> minutes. It's been about 10 minutes and so far I see nothing. >>> >>> Dick, I wonder if you have a chance, can take a look at the Stax logs >>> and see if there is anything within the last 15 minutes or so? It is >>> about 18:45 ECT (17:45 GMT) now, I think. I'm really bad at timezones >>> though, so I might be confused :-) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ethan >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.m...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hello Anne, >>>> >>>> Glad to get greeting from you! >>>> >>>> 2010/12/15 Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yoji...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> Fantastic thanks, will do some testing tomorrow :) >>>>> >>>>> Hi Vladimir btw. >>>>> Great to have you on board! >>>>> >>>>> /Anne >>>>> >>>>> On 14 December 2010 17:36, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > Great! >>>>> > >>>>> > 2010/12/14 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com> >>>>> > >>>>> >> Just deployed a clean version on Stax and it works. Yeah. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Serves me right for playing around with my deployments. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Please test. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> If tests go well today and tomorrow, we could merge the branch into the >>>>> >> trunk. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> D. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.m...@gmail.com >>>>> > >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> > Ethan, >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > I'm using Chrome 8.0.552.224 beta on Windows right now. I'll try >>>>> Firefox >>>>> >> 3.5 >>>>> >> > and IE 7 when you deploy new version. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > 2010/12/14 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >> Wait a second. I could be the cause of the error - I forgot to >>>>> >> >> change >>>>> >> >> a test Javascript that I changed. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Deploying again.... >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> D. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjew...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >> > Ok, this prompted me to check in IE and I am indeed getting a >>>>> >> >> > javascript error there. I'm not going to be able to recreate that >>>>> >> >> > locally because I am not set up to build ESME on Windows. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > What version of Chrome are you using? >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Vladimir, what browser are you using? >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Dick, you can switch it back whenever you want. Seems that it is a >>>>> JS >>>>> >> >> > error in the message display code and we'll have to work through >>>>> that. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Ethan >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Richard Hirsch < >>>>> >> hirsch.d...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjew...@gmail.com >>>>> > >>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>> It is working fine for me - Chrome on Windows at the moment. >>>>> >> >> >>> http://esmecloudserverapache.dickhirsch.staxapps.net/ - right? >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Can you see my new messages? >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> Nope. >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Ethan >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Richard Hirsch < >>>>> >> hirsch.d...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>> I just looked. >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> The data is there but still it doesn't work in IE or Chrome. >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> Please tell me when I can redeploy the older version. >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> D. >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Richard Hirsch < >>>>> >> >> hirsch.d...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Redeployed the 2.2 version on stax. It still doesn't work me. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Please test. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> D. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Ethan Jewett < >>>>> esjew...@gmail.com >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Hi Vladimir, >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> On Stax we are using an external MySQL database, so the old >>>>> >> messages >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> should persist. >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Dick, how hard would it be to redeploy the Lift 2.2 version >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> to >>>>> >> Stax? >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> I'd like to take a look and see if the problem is on the >>>>> >> front-end >>>>> >> >> (a >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> javascript issue). >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Ethan >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >>>>> >> >> lester.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> As far as I understand, for embedded Derby instance in >>>>> another >>>>> >> >> branch >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> (folder) it will be completely new instance, without data. >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> 2010/12/14 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> I looked at the log on stax and I didn't see any errors. I >>>>> >> didn't >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> create any new messages I just looked to see if existing >>>>> ones >>>>> >> >> showed >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> up. >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> I haven't tried the new version locally - maybe, you could >>>>> give >>>>> >> it >>>>> >> >> a try. >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> D. >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >>>>> >> >> lester.m...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > Richard, >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > Have you seen any exceptions, errors etc? New messages >>>>> aren't >>>>> >> >> posted and >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > displayed in timeline, are them? >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > 2010/12/14 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> just deployed on stax and saw that the timelines didn't >>>>> >> work, >>>>> >> >> so I >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> redeployed an older version. >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> So it looks like we have some more work to do with the >>>>> 2.2 >>>>> >> >> port. >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> D. >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ethan Jewett < >>>>> >> >> esjew...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > "list :-) newItem" means "replace the last item in the >>>>> >> list >>>>> >> >> with >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > newItem". Obviously ;-) >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:16 AM, >>>>> >> >> darren.ha...@fortybeans.com >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > <dha...@fortybeans.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> Was that a smiley at the end, or another new >>>>> operator...? >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> On 14 December 2010 at 07:07 Ethan Jewett < >>>>> >> >> esjew...@gmail.com> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> Thanks both of you. This is great! :-) >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> I love learning something new this early in the >>>>> morning, >>>>> >> >> even if it >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> is >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> a little bit early for that many : + and = operators >>>>> :-) >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> Ethan >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Vassil Dichev < >>>>> >> >> vdic...@apache.org> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> Thanks to Richard, Ethan and Vassil, it seems >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> ESME >>>>> >> has >>>>> >> >> been >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> successfully >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> migrated to Scala 2.8 and Lift 2.2! >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> > ... and thanks to your quick help! Also: "Yay for >>>>> >> tests"! >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > -- >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > Best Regards, >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> -- >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Vladimir Ivanov >>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > -- >>>>> >> > Best Regards, >>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Best Regards, >>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Vladimir Ivanov >>>> >>> >> >
