On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 17:22 +0000, David Lutterkort wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:01 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Even if you convince upstream to adopt your grand unified configuration > > scheme > > And therein lies the rub. I've been very careful to make sure that > Augeas' usability does not depend on any upstream adopting it - they > have perfectly valid reasons not to do that, starting with that they > can't tell which proposed scheme will actually work out (and therefore > deserve their support) > > Augeas (or any similar config scheme) _has_ to be workable without > upstream support - it would be great if we get some eventually [1], but > we first need to prove that Augeas is worth their effort. > > David > > [1] And for now, it would really only require them shipping a schema > with their software, i.e. plonking one text file > into /usr/share/augeas/lenses
Cool. It would be really useful to see some doco online about how an upstream could support the forma - and see some sample schemas for, say, Samba / BIND / Apache HTTPD. Cheers, Mike ________________________________________________ Mike MacCana Technical Specialist Linux Services IBM Global Services Level 14, 60 City Rd Southgate Vic 3000 Phone: +61-3-8656-2138 Fax: +61-4-8656-2423 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
