I also liked the solid blue color for the lettering. The range of colors seems to busy to me.
I think the solid color looks best with one of the previous script fonts as well. I am not fond of the handwritten look. -- James On 12/15/08 10:26 AM, "Jan Capps (jacapps)" <[email protected]> wrote: > I like #1 better than #2 but I liked having etch in solid blue. I like > the line under #1 better than #2. > ________________________________ > > From: Scott Comer (sccomer) > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 9:17 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: missing pictures...] > > > nice, #1. i really like it. > > etch committers, any comments? are we ready to vote? > > scott out > > Thien wrote: > > Hi, > Didn't do much, I only added more blue to the start of the > gradient. > > I think solid underline might be better, since the logotype > already has gradient, another one for the underline seems over and it > also steal some attention off the logotype. > > > https://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/laboratory/users/thien/etch/visuals.pn > g > > Thien > > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:58 AM, scott comer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > the less floaty is good. it also adds some terminal > emphasis, like, OK! the color gradient > suggests ink drying, or perhaps invisible ink being > revealed. i like it. > > i like #3. wife suggested that the gradient on the word > etch have more blue at the start. > > #4 would be good, too, but i think it weakens the impact > of the underline. that could be > good because we do not want to suggest too much finality > (heh, etched in stone). > > i think we are very close. thanks so much for your > effort, thien. > > scott out > > -- James Dixson Manager, Software Development CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems (e) [email protected] (p) 512-336-3305 (m) 512-968-2116
