This framework definitely will help Etch developers down the road but I see this as lower priority item compares to other near term enhancements such as name service. What kind of control can the framework have on the interface level? For example, each run has different set of values for method parameters. Extend <stdouttg> and <stderrtag> to support timestamp?
________________________________ From: Scott Comer (sccomer) Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: rfc: interoperability testing... [again] [sorry, i flubbed the link. -scott] i've put a note up on the wiki about ideas for interoperability testing. Interoperability Testing Framework <http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ETCH/Interoperability+Testin g+Framework> please review and comment. thanks, scott out
