thanks for that clarification, david!

scott out

David Staudt (dstaudt) wrote:
My suggestion was basically #2 with a smoother, more regular font - the current #2 font has wavy edges and looks hand-lettered. Otherwise backing #2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Scott Comer (sccomer)
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:45 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [vote] etch logo

ok, so last week we had discussion, the sense it got was that these logos were enough for a vote. david staudt suggested a combination of (2) and (3) which i don't entirely understand (please explain david!). let's call that (4) an have it as a virtual icon. please vote now for (1) through (4). you've got 48 hours. only committers have a vote, others may express their opinion. committers are scott, jd, seth, james, rene, guarav, jim, youngjin.

thanks,
scott out






Reply via email to