Hehe.. Thanks for the mentoring Niclas; we will proceed to allow the pendulum to swing in the other direction. :-)
-- james On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > I have a feeling that "too much" voting is going on... Typically we > run "consensus" in Apache projects, i.e. someone makes a suggestion > for changes or actions, and if people object they yell, otherwise > proceed. For code changes, typically that means that the 'proposer' go > ahead and make the changes, and if objections shows up and resolved to > not make the change, then that is reversed. This has been coined CTR > (Commit-Then-Review). Httpd project and others, run a RTC format for > stable branches, but the vast majority uses the CTR model (incl httpd > during 'new heavy development'). > > So, the only 'requirement' for proper voting is Releases (well, some > community issues as well, but...), which is a legal act and must be > done properly. > > Cheers > Niclas > -- > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java >
