i'm done with the major structural changes. you may fool with the java
code and build scripts. i'm
still holding the lock on the csharp binding runtime, csharp tests and
examples, and all the csprojs.
scott out
James Dixson wrote:
I agree. I think we should rename the C# packages as well it makes sense.
.. Are you about to release your virtual lock on trunk ... Others would like
to check-in code too :-)
--
James
On 1/28/09 3:06 PM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <[email protected]> wrote:
and remember now that i forgot to ask what we should do about the etch
for csharp package names.
while java runtime package names are now org.apache.etch.util.* and
org.apache.etch.bindings.java.*,
the csharp names have always been simpler: Etch.*
It seems like they should be Org.Apache.Etch.Bindings.Csharp.*
this allows other csharp bindings than just the one we have.
scott out
6
