shouldn't the files with pgp sigs be named .pgp instead of .asc?
James Dixson wrote:
Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the top-level directory to reduce clutter. The candidate files can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/ Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
Each file should have an MD5, SHA1 and a *PGP *Signature.
Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday). -- james
