+1 from me too.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Gaurav Sandhir (gsandhir) <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Manoj Ganesan [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:05 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1 > > + 1 for the inclusion. > Manoj. > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM, scott comer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ok, folks, i need some votes to proceed... >> >> scott out >> >> >> scott comer wrote: >> >>> currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a > >>> fix for this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so >>> long ago, what do you say for putting it in 1.1? >>> >>> it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and > >>> built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem. >>> >>> i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the >>> issue) if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might > be rick. >>> >>> +1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1) >>> >>> scott out >>> >>> >> >
