> -----Original Message----- > From: Guy Harris > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:41:17AM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote: > > I have not have the specs on my table > > I have them on my (FreeBSD) desktop (at home) - in fact, I could have > had *two* copies of the Q.850 spec just now, because I'm an idiot and > bought a copy from the ITU Web site before checking whether I already > had one - and it looks as if at least some of the problematic cause > codes aren't specified in Q.931. > > However, some pages seem to show those cause codes, e.g.: > > http://www.planet.net.au/~neale/aus-isdn/Q931short.html > > "008 Prefix 0 dialed but not allowed". > > I don't know whether that's because they're national ISDN codes rather > than Q.931 standard codes, or what.
Most of those Q.931 codes match a subset of the causes listed in CISCO-ATM2-MIB Where they don't could be interpretation. Regards, Andrew Hood A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn't even know existed can render your own computer unusable. -- Leslie Lamport, as quoted in CACM, June 1992
<<application/ms-tnef>>
