[Ethereal-dev] Re: [Ethereal-users] Questions on using ethereal / tethereal

[Jason House]

I generally deal with low data rates, so maybe I'm unused to the strains 
of high speed data captures, but to me it seems the overhead of a single 
fopen/fclose call pair shouldn't be so high that it can't be afforded.

From the practical standpoint, is there any good reason why 
ethereal/tethereal will open as many file as there are files in the ring 
buffer?  Is  I would have to imagine that having the current file being 
written to open would be enough.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   2. Re: [Ethereal-users] Questions on using ethereal /        tethereal
      (Ian Schorr)
   3. Re: Re: [Ethereal-users] Questions on using ethereal      /
      tethereal (Laurent Deniel)
   4. Re: Re: [Ethereal-users] Questions on using ethereal /
      tethereal (Ian Schorr)
   5. Re: [Ethereal-users] Questions on using ethereal /        tethereal
      (Guy Harris)
   6. RE: Re: [Ethereal-users] Questions on using ethere        al /
      tethereal (Biot Olivier)
   7. RE: Re: [Ethereal-users] Questions on using ethere        al /
      tethereal (Biot Olivier)