On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Guy Harris wrote: > guy 2003/09/03 02:11:13 CDT > > Modified files: > . packet-rpc.c > Log: > Use "rpc_item", rather than "rpc_tree", as the argument to > "proto_item_append_text()" (they have the same value, and the same > underlying type, but it's cleaner). > > Even if there already is a conversation when we're dissecting a call, > make the conversation dissector for the conversation the RPC dissector - > the conversation might've been created by the TCP dissector, or by us in > order to do fragment reassembly.
Hmmm, shouldn't packet-rpc.c be packet-oncrpc.c? Regards ----- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
