Doesn't glibc include a MD5 set of utilities? Why not provide our own copies of that code, to be linked in if it is not found? Or is there something else we need that is not available in that version of the MD5 code?
-Ashok On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:34:42 +1030 (CST) Richard Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, David Frascone wrote: > > > Well, once we *can* link openssl, I'd love to be able to dissect encrypted > > streams, assuming that ethereal has access to the private keys. (ssldump > > can do it) > > > > I'd be all for e-mailing all authors for consent, assuming a bounce or no > > response == consent, as preposed earlier by Hamish. > > I would be happy to change the licence to make Ethereal more usable or > more capable, but I think we *must* get agreement from all authors. > > Regards > ----- > Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > Ethereal-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev > --- Asok the Intern ---------------------------------------- Ashok Narayanan IOS Network Protocols, Cisco Systems 250 Apollo Drive, Chelmsford, MA 01824 Ph: 978-497-8387. Fax: 978-497-8513 (Attn: Ashok Narayanan)
