Guy Harris wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:26:47PM +1100, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:

You do not use any color filters.


Correct.  Not everybody does, so getting rid of the filter would still
help.

However, it might be possible, with a summary list widget with a
callback, to have the color set when a row is displayed - dissect the
packet when the row is displayed and, if there's a color filter,
construct a protocol tree, run the color filter, and color it then. (Think of it as "lazy coloring".)


But it doesn't solve the main issue: filters are slow.

Can we tell from a filter if we need to fully decode a protocol?
What about a display attribute in the tree structure, with it we might 'if enclosed' a lot of expensive sprintf calls.


BTW there's a bug in tcp desegmentation when packets are lost, retransmited:
    %
 63.83     11.01    11.01    13448     0.00     0.00  fragment_add_work
  1.80     11.32     0.31                             tcp_segment_equal
  1.74     11.62     0.30    23063     0.00     0.00  dissect_tcp
it's 20MB  AFP capture.

Didier



Reply via email to