I have to say good job as well. A trace I have been using with a million packets in it now only takes 59 seconds to decode, as opposed to 0.9.16 where it was at 1 minute 56 seconds!
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote: > I just want to salute all that are involved in and contributing big and > small to improving the performance. > > > Thanks to all. > > > Please keep ideas, patches and profile data coming. We have already in just > a few weeks made ethereal significantly faster than > version 0.9.16. > > > I just checked in patches for 2 pretty cheap fixes that made tethereal maybe > 3% faster. Not much in itself but if we do 20 more of these 3% fixes > it all adds up to something one can actually notice. > > > > Gerald, maybe there should be a temporary ethereal-performance mailing > list for these activities? there are many interested and contributing and > it would keep performance stuff from spamming/polluting the main developer > list? > Not everyone is really working with datasets large enough that performance > is an important issue and performance related mailings are already taking up > a large amount of the ethereal-dev traffic. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ethereal-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev > _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
