Biot Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 08.12.03 16:01:59: > > | From: Ulf Lamping > | > | Hmm, that sounds to me like the first export function, so we > | should put this into a new submenu item? What about putting this into: > | > | File->Export->Raw Packet Data (Of Selected Area) > > I'd propose to use "File -> Export" as menu item, and then let the user pick > an option from a list (radio button): selected frames, selected frame, > selected data in frame (or something like that). You could even add an > option having either the value "export to bytes in network-order" (default), > "export as hex" or "export as (what we call the byte view)". >
Well, the actual structure of the "File->Export" submenu has to be thought of. I'm currently unsure, how the actual functionality should be structured in there and how it should be called. I just didn't like the place where this menu item is placed, as this *will* confuse the users IMHO. > | Putting this into an export submenu makes it more obvious, > | that this is a special function compared to the normal "Save" > | or "Save As" functions. > > Do you see XML output as a Save option or as an Export option? > As I don't know much about the XML output, so I'm unsure on this topic also. If the file format will be a standardized well known way to transfer data (for in- and output), this would better reside in the "File->Save/Save As" menu item. If it's an output only file format with several different DTD's, then it's maybe better to put it into the "File->Export" submenu. Regards, ULFL ______________________________________________________________________________ WEB.DE FreeMail wird 5 Jahre jung! Feiern Sie mit uns und nutzen Sie die neuen Funktionen http://f.web.de/features/?mc=021130 _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
