Hello Guy, > But the time stamps look as if they're relative to the Windows FILETIME > epoch, namely midnight, January 1, 1601. I've checked in changes to > handle that; they appear to work, although there *might* be time zone > issues.
Good catch!! According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpref/h tml/frlrfsystemdatetimeclasstofiletimeutctopic.asp the time stamp is at UTC. This time is also with 100 nanoseconds increments! Does Airopeek also use 100 nanoseconds time increments? Best regards, Martijn Schipper. ******************Legal Disclaimer************************** "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email [EMAIL PROTECTED], and delete the message. Thank you." **************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
