From: Gerald Combs | Joerg Mayer wrote: | | > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:04:21AM -0600, Gerald Combs wrote: | > | >> "Makefile fragments included this way are always distributed because | >> there are needed to rebuild Makefile.in." | >> | >>It appears that gtk/Makefile.common should have been included in the | >>distribution automatically. | > | > | > Hmm, that is cool. Did you create the tarball via make distcheck or via | > make dist (and did the make distcheck on some other system)? | | The tarball was created by running "make distclean", "autogen.sh", | "configure", and "make distcheck" (which depends on "dist") in that order. | | BTW, I had to rename the CVS directory for the release so that | make-version.pl wouldn't define CVSVERSION. Is there a cleaner way to | undefine CVSVERSION?
AFAIK make dist should not include the CVS directories and the .cvsignore files, however this seems to be the case. As a result, the make-version.pl script sees that we're building from CVS and it will generate a CVS version in cvsversion.h. Maybe we want to create a beacon file in the top-level directory which would then inform make-version.pl that we're creating a real official release hence creating a cvsversion.h header *without* defining the CVS version. Regards, Olivier _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
