Hi, I don't see why this implies disabling 'ecrt_domain_size' in user-space? Would you mind to merge such a patch if I submit one?
Best regards, Philippe Hamelin According to the mailing list (http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/2012/001564.html), I'm not the first user requesting a user-space 'ecrt_domain_size'. -----Message d'origine----- De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Florian Pose Envoyé : 4 janvier 2013 05:23 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: [etherlab-users] Why does ecrt_domain_size and ecrt_domain_external_memory are reserved to kernel mode? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Am 19.12.2012 15:02, schrieb [email protected]: > is there a specific reason why the methods ecrt_domain_size and > ecrt_domain_external_memory are reserved to kernel mode? I would like > to copy or share the domain's data to another process using a shared > memory, so I have at least to know the size of the whole process data. yes, the reason is that the process data already are in a shared memory between kernel and userspace, when using the userspace library. - -- Viele Grüße, Florian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDmrXEACgkQABFOIMygR8x3YwCgipkkL6U4qyVywYbu33r77FiA E+0AnRiVMd7MQnbRxHUxI0HYMRH4ojMn =+lfF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ etherlab-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users _______________________________________________ etherlab-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
