Hi,
Occasionally I had the problem getting wrong FoE opcodes on my slave.
The attached patch forces the "reserved byte" to be zero as requested by
ETG1000.6 when sending the FoE data opcode.
The other opcodes are already correctly written with the U16 macro.
regards
Ralf
diff -r 9cdd7669dc0b master/fsm_foe.c
--- a/master/fsm_foe.c Thu Jan 10 17:36:41 2013 +0100
+++ b/master/fsm_foe.c Tue Jan 22 16:30:55 2013 +0100
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
return -1;
}
- EC_WRITE_U8 (data, EC_FOE_OPCODE_DATA); // OpCode = DataBlock req.
+ EC_WRITE_U16 (data, EC_FOE_OPCODE_DATA); // OpCode = DataBlock req.
EC_WRITE_U32(data + 2, fsm->tx_packet_no); // PacketNo, Password
memcpy(data + EC_FOE_HEADER_SIZE,
_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
