Yes, I would also be extremely interested in the patch.
It would actually be very(!!!) useful to have available variation of
ecrt_master_receive() that would block and wait till the transaction is
done and then returns ASAP when it can.
The other option would be some notification from master or NIC that it
received and so ecrt_master_receive() call is safe now.
Thanks,
Ian
On 11/20/2013 11:39, Jeroen Van den Keybus wrote:
Someone actually did that and I extensively tested it. The patch
was very simple.
How was this packet arrival time measured ?
...the ethercat master developers said you don't need to know when a
packet arrives.
I could understand their point if the patch would hurt performance too much.
I still have the patch although it needs a bit of adaptation, in
case they come to their senses. Perhaps if others also mention it
would be useful they would accept that function.
Well, if it's not too much asked, I'd like to see it.
Thanks,
J.
_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
