Hi,
If I want to access a slave on the Ethercat bus, we use the position of the
slave on the bus to access it with ecrt_master_slave_config(). If we then put a
new slave on the bus before this slave for example, this means that the
position number of the first slave will change and we need to reconfigure our
code.? This presents problems.
My question is, can we not access the slave via their physical addresses
instead of this incremental position addressing, therefore not needing to
update the position address every time there is a change?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
