Thanks a lot, I will give it a try. Philippe
> Le 23 avr. 2018 à 02:00, Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On 21 April 2018 16:45, quoth Philippe Leuba: >> I noticed that when we activate the master it takes a time that is >> proportional >> to the number of slaves to switch them to OP state. >> Is there any reason the master can not do it in parallel ? > > You can try the unofficial patchset > (https://sourceforge.net/u/uecasm/etherlab-patches/ci/default/tree/#readme). > > While it can't do it completely in parallel without consuming a lot of > bandwidth and risking breaking the realtime cycle, one of the feature patches > that this includes allows scanning and configuration to occur in parallel up > to the configured bandwidth limits. With default settings this results in > blocks of 16 slaves at a time being configured in parallel. > _______________________________________________ etherlab-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
