Hi Richard,

First of all I'd like to thank you for your patience with me.

I agree that I will most likely see the working slave respects to INIT command. In fact, I already demonstrated to our customer that it works fine with our controller.

But unfortunately, I can't persuade our customer that the one I have in my desk is broken. Because I just connected it via twincat, it goes to OP mode and I can see the process data :(

Yesterday I asked the manufacturer about the model of the ESC used in this device. Not received a reply yet. Maybe it can tell us something?

Also I'll try the commands you sent, while the master uses the SII binary file instead of reading directly from the device.

Best regards,

Oğuz.


On 25-Mar-26 10:25 AM, Richard Hacker wrote:
Hello Oguz,

As far as I can see, your slave is broken! You are not even at the
application level.

The "ethercat" commands I sent you show that the slave will not go to
INIT even on an idle bus. Try those commands again with your working
slave and you will see that it respects the INIT command.



On Tue, 2026-03-24 at 12:31 +0300, Bilko AS, Oguz Dilmac wrote:
Hi Richard, Here are the outputs of the commands after a fresh start. No
application is running.
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo /usr/local/etc/init.d/ethercat restart
  Shutting down EtherCAT master 1.6.8  done
  Starting EtherCAT master 1.6.8  done
  lynca@lynca:~$ ethercat slave -v
  === Master 0, Slave 0 ===
  Device: Main
  State: PREOP
  Flag: +
  Identity:
    Vendor Id:       0x6167656d
    Product code:    0x00000000
    Revision number: 0x00000000
    Serial number:   0x00000000
  DL information:
    FMMU bit operation: no
    Distributed clocks: yes, 64 bit
    DC system time transmission delay: 0 ns
  Port  Type  Link  Loop    Signal  NextSlave  RxTime [ns]  Diff [ns]
  NextDc [ns]
     0  MII   up    open    yes             -    811350812
  0           0
     1  MII   down  closed  no              -            -           -
            -
     2  N/A   down  closed  no              -            -           -
            -
     3  N/A   down  closed  no              -            -           -
            -
  Mailboxes:
    Bootstrap RX: 0x1000/1024, TX: 0x1400/1024
    Standard  RX: 0x1000/1024, TX: 0x1400/1024
    Supported protocols: CoE, FoE
  General:
    Group: SSC_Device
    Image name:
    Order number: Megatec_ESC_NLCH
    Device name: Megatec_ESC_NLCH
    CoE details:
      Enable SDO: yes
      Enable SDO Info: yes
      Enable PDO Assign: no
      Enable PDO Configuration: no
      Enable Upload at startup: no
      Enable SDO complete access: yes
    Flags:
      Enable SafeOp: no
      Enable notLRW: no
    Current consumption: 0 mA
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0000
  0x98 152
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0001
  0x01 1
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0002
  0x0001 1
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0004
  0x08 8
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0005
  0x08 8
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0006
  0x08 8
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0007
  0x0f 15
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0008
  0x01cc 460
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0120
  0x0002 2
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0130
  0x0002 2
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0134
  0x0000 0
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat state -p0 init
  lynca@lynca:~$ ethercat slaves
  0  0:0  PREOP  E  Megatec_ESC_NLCH
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0120
  0x0001 1
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0130
  0x0002 2
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0134
  0x0000 0
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat state -p0 preop
  lynca@lynca:~$ ethercat slaves
  0  0:0  PREOP  +  Megatec_ESC_NLCH
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0120
  0x0001 1
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0130
  0x0002 2
  lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0134
  0x0000 0
  lynca@lynca:~$
The documents of the slave is mostly focused on the application. I
screen copied the Ethercat related section below. The rest describes
the content of the PDOs
---- 1 Introduction
  This document describes a communication protocol between the CNC and
the processing optic using the EtherCAT bus.
  All information is transferred inside cyclical process data objects
(PDO). Specific data in PDOs is referenced as following: TxPDO 4 –
TxPDO, word 4 TxPDO 2/3 – TxPDO, word 2, bit 3 Words and bits are
counted from 0.
  After the power is switched on the processing optic’s controller is
booted up and references the lens motor. This takes approx. 10
seconds. Afterwards that the optic is ready for operation and does
not need any additional initialization.
  2 EtherCAT protocol description
  The processing optic is an EtherCAT slave device. The minimum cycle
time is 1 millisecond.
------- Below that point, the document describes the PDO content... By the way, I will ask which ESC controller is used. What else do you
suggest to ask?
Best regards, Oguz. On 24-Mar-26 11:23 AM, Richard Hacker wrote:
OK, the slave does not transition to INIT, regardless (0x130 should
match 0x120).

Next test:
with a fresh restart (no application running)
        ethercat slave -v
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0000
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0001
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0002
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0004
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0005
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0006
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint8 0x0007
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0008
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0120
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0130
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0134
        ethercat state -p0 init
        ethercat sl
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0120
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0130
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0134
        ethercat state -p0 preop
        ethercat sl
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0120
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0130
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x0134

The important address is 0x0134 (AL Status code). Can you check in
the
documentation what the manufacturor writes about the status code


On Tue, 2026-03-24 at 10:36 +0300, Bilko AS, Oguz Dilmac wrote:
Hi Richard, Graeme,

I was out of the office. Thank you for the suggestions. Graeme
I'll
try
to look into it.

Mr Richard, here are the outputs of the commands after I powered
both
PC
and the slave:

lynca@lynca:~$ sudo /usr/local/etc/init.d/ethercat restart
Shutting down EtherCAT master 1.6.8  done
Starting EtherCAT master 1.6.8  done
lynca@lynca:~$ ethercat slave
0  0:0  PREOP  +  Megatec_ESC_NLCH
lynca@lynca:~$ ethercat slaves
0  0:0  PREOP  +  Megatec_ESC_NLCH
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat state -p0 init
lynca@lynca:~$ ethercat slave
0  0:0  PREOP  E  Megatec_ESC_NLCH
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat state -p0 preop
lynca@lynca:~$ ethercat slave
0  0:0  PREOP  +  Megatec_ESC_NLCH
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint32 0x900
0x0af50b04 183831300
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint64 0x910
0x00000051a7927504 350703744260
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x120
0x0001 1
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x130
0x0002 2
lynca@lynca:~$

And these are executed while the application is running:

lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat slave
0  0:0  PREOP  E  Megatec_ESC_NLCH
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x120
0x0001 1
lynca@lynca:~$ sudo ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x130
0x0002 2

The installed ethercat master is 1.6.8 with Mr James Benway's
patch
for
reading sii from a
file (
https://github.com/DSI-Gleeble/ethercat/tree/sii-from-file).
But I
removed the binary sii files so that the master can read from
slave
as
normal.

Can you see something?

Best regards,

Oguz.


On 20-Mar-26 6:34 PM, Richard Hacker wrote:
My suspicion is that your problem is way before the master
tries to
configure the slave, as I have said before.

When the master is activated, it jogs the slave through the
INIT,
PREOP, SAFEOP and eventually OP states. A slave gets configured
(SDO
parameters, PDO setup) between the PREOP and SAFEOP state --
but
your
slave never gets there. Your slave might go into INIT, but
somehow
the
master does not get this state change.

Can you change the slave state from the command line? With your
slave
attached but without your application running (i.e. idle free-
run
bus),
what is the output of:
        ethercat slave
        ethercat state -p0 init
        ethercat slave
        ethercat state -p0 preop
        ethercat slave
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint32 0x900
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint64 0x910
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x120
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x130

Now start your application and:
        ethercat state
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x120
        ethercat reg_read -p0 -tuint16 0x130


-p0 assumes the affedted slave is the first slave in the
network.
Adjust accordingly if that is not the case.

On Fri, 2026-03-20 at 00:02 +0000, Graeme Foot wrote:
Hi Oguz, If this is a potential fix for your slave, you would require
more
separation, plus I’m not sure you got your reads vs writes
assigned
quite right.  i.e. from your log 0x6000:01 is being assigned
to
domain 0 when it looks like it should be assigned to domain
1.
The issue with the Texas Instruments ESC’s in particular is
that
if
you use one domain the writes (control) and reads (status)
are
too
close together for the ESC’s syncs to handle gracefully.
E.g.:
+ domain 0 -------------------+
[slave 0 write][slave 0 read]|
If you split them into two domains you get: + domain 0 -----+ domain 1 ----+
[slave 0 write]|[slave 0 read]|
Which timing wise is no real difference and still a problem. But if you add a few more slaves (they don’t even need to be
online)
you get:
+ domain 0 -------------------------+ domain 1 --------------
----
----
--+
[slave 0 write][slave 1 write][...]| [slave 0 read][slave 1
read][...]| You can see you now have more separation between the slave 0
write
and read.
In your example (apart from the potential incorrect
allocation
which
could itself cause issues) I don’t think the EL2008 would be
enough
to give a big enough separation (only 1 byte?).  Try adding
two
or
three more of your problem slaves (they’re around 78 bytes
each).
Here’s some background info on the Texas Instruments
issue:
https://www.ti.com/lit/an/spracj7/spracj7.pdf?ts=1669243747147
   * section 3.1.3 describes the TI ESC not working with non-
overlapping PDOs
   * Section 3.6 describes a malformed packet issue and its
workarounds, due to overlapping PDOs
In our cases where we’ve had problems with slaves our
symptoms
were:
     1. On assigning the FMMU configuration the slave would
stop
forwarding on frames
     2. I think we had one that got stuck in INIT, but can’t
remember
for sure
Regards,
Graeme.

From: Bilko AS, Oguz Dilmac <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, 19 March 2026 23:49
To: Graeme Foot <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Etherlab-users] Timeout while setting state
INIT.
Hi Graeme,
I connected a EK1100 bus coupler and a EL2008 digital output
card.
The first slave is the EK1100, and my device stay at the end.
I created two domains
Unfortunately the device still don't go to INIT.
Here, I put my test code and the dmesg output:
https://we.tl/t-Dj1MtId6LA
Best regards,
Oguz.
On 19-Mar-26 1:16 AM, Graeme Foot wrote:
Hi Oguz, It’s not looking likely to be an SII problem then.  From the log it looks like you’re using a single
Read/Write
domain.  I don’t recall if you mentioned, have tried
putting it
in
separate read and write domains?  If you try this, also
ensure
that
there are at least two other separate read and write domain
slaves
also configured in your system.
I’ve had a few slaves in the past (generally with Texas
Instruments
ESC’s) that work well with overlapped PDO’s in a single
Read/Write
domain (TwinCat’s default method), but fail when the PDO’s
are
not
overlapped (EtherLab’s default).  If this is the case you
can
put
them in separate read and write domains to separate them
within
the
EtherCat frame.  But, you need to ensure there’s a couple
of
other
read and write domain devices also configured to ensure
there’s
enough separation in the frame.
Graeme.

From: Bilko AS, Oguz Dilmac<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, 19 March 2026 02:33
To: Graeme Foot <[email protected]>; Richard
Hacker<[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Etherlab-users] Timeout while setting state
INIT.
Hi,
I noticed, the correct path with option is: "--enable-sii-
override=/lib/firmware"
This way, the master can find my ec_xxx.bin file. But still
at
the
end, slave doesn't respond to go INIT command.
Here is the dmesg output:
https://we.tl/t-BGDmNzZv2b
Best regards,
Oguz.
--
Oguz Dilmac
Bilko AS, R&D Manager
====================================
Perpa Ticaret Merkezi B Blok Kat 13 Nr. 2536
TR-34384 Okmeydani Istanbul Turkey
Tel : +90 212 563 00 00
e-mail : [email protected]
web site : http://www.bilko-automation.com
https://www.youtube.com/@LyncaCNC
--
Oguz Dilmac

Bilko AS, R&D Manager
====================================
Perpa Ticaret Merkezi B Blok Kat 13 Nr. 2536
TR-34384 Okmeydani Istanbul Turkey
Tel : +90 212 563 00 00
e-mail : [email protected]
web site : http://www.bilko-automation.com
https://www.youtube.com/@LyncaCNC


--
Oguz Dilmac

Bilko AS, R&D Manager
====================================
Perpa Ticaret Merkezi B Blok Kat 13 Nr. 2536
TR-34384 Okmeydani Istanbul Turkey
Tel : +90 212 563 00 00
e-mail : [email protected]
web site : http://www.bilko-automation.com
https://www.youtube.com/@LyncaCNC


--
Etherlab-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Reply via email to