Le 7 mars 05, à 13:34, M. Uli Kusterer a écrit :
At 2:27 Uhr +0000 07.03.2005, Nicolas Roard wrote:
No, the {A name}Kit habit is ok for me. My only question was, is it
ok to use the name "lucene" ? I mean, sure, it's a portage.. but it's
in a different language.. duno. LuceneKit is probably enoughly
different to not confuse people though.
Have you asked the Lucene folks about this? I think it's only polite.
After all, they might be the ones receiving bug reports for code that
you wrote.
We haven't asked them, but I know there are various Lucene
implementations in C++, C# etc. named "Lucene" but with a prefix or
suffix… More here :
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneImplementations
http://www.gnome.org/projects/beagle/ : GNOME Beagle uses their own
Lucene C# version to take a concrete example.
And that's why I have proposed this LuceneKit similar scheme for the
Lucene Objective-C port name.
Why do you think they would receive bug reports for the code we wrote
(unless they are going to advertise/distribute this Objective-C port) ?
Quentin.
--
Quentin Mathé
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
