On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:28:55 -0800, Alex Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you referring to http://sourceforge.net/projects/resonance ? If so, > I don't really see it as a problem, personally. It's a fairly common > word. I think that using the "another project exists which uses the same > name" argument is a red herring, because (A) that resonance project is > not well known, (B) they haven't released anything at all since 2001, > (C) every single file in their CVS archive is over four years old. Were > this some well-known project, I would likely agree with you, however it > is not, and to top it off it's dead, or at the very least, very, very, > very dormant.
There are 2 project named Resonance on sf. BTW, I don't know being well known (A) is a valid argument. (B) (C) sounds more valid but see http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=125252
