On 9/2/06, Hans baier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok I understand. Well, we will have to take a decision about StepTalk > at > some point. For now, I'm still in favor of using it.
I'm not sure I understand the decision ?.. Steptalk still works fine.
For me, PyObjc would be a compelling alternative too, since few people can talk smalltalk, but python is very widespread....
What a shame... (ok, I can't stand Python and love Smalltalk... what can I do !) Seriously, Smalltalk is extremely easy to pick up... and very readable. Anyway, we should keep StepTalk -- Stefan stepped down, yes, but it still works fine and imho is an excellent foundation/architecture for adding scripting to applications; beside StepTalk is not limited to Smalltalk. We could have a Python and Ruby bundle ;) Note that we are talking about Scripting -- languages bridges are a different story. PyObjC would be nice to have (even if I don't personnally like python, considering so many persons like this language and that it's an ok language, eh...) anyway, the same as CamelBone, RubyCocoa, etc. -- Nicolas Roard "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -- Douglas Adams _______________________________________________ Etoile-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
