Le 16 févr. 07 à 18:07, David Chisnall a écrit :
On 16 Feb 2007, at 16:35, Quentin Mathé wrote:
I'm ok with this model, perhaps /stable should go along /trunk
rather than in /branches/stable. What do you think?
So the top level svn view would be:
/branches/
{individual branches for individual work if people want them}
/trunk/ (main development work)
/stable/ (stuff moved from /trunk that seems to be working)
It's exactly what I mean.
/releases/
0.2/ (current release + bug fixes)
0.3/ (next release + bug fixes)
...
If that's what you mean, then it sounds sensible. If not, explain
more :)
Except I don't think it's wise to have release branches right now
(for manpower reason).
Releases tagged in /tags/ should be sufficient.
Quentin.
_______________________________________________
Etoile-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
