On Nov 23, 2007 8:00 AM, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 22 nov. 07 à 17:58, David Chisnall a écrit : > > > On 22 Nov 2007, at 16:51, Jesse Ross wrote: > > > >>> We'd like to have a meeting in SILC next Wednesday evening (7pm > >>> UTC?). We need to discuss what we are going to do for FOSDEM and > >>> what > >>> we need to prioritise for the 0.3 release which should happen > >>> concurrently. > >> > >> Sounds great to me -- I'll be there. > > Fine for me too.
You mean 11/28 ? It's 11AM here and I can make it. Since it is work hour, I may walk away from time to time during the meeting. I am going to get a new macbook, which will make it easier for me to work on Etoile. I can polish some small stuffs here and there. To me, most important thing is CoreObject + EtoileUI for FOSDEM. Anyone has opinions on VMware Fusion or Parallel for development (probably with FreeBSD) ? I used VirtualPC before and it is slow on harddisk-intensive task, like compiling. I wonder whether it is improved in VMware Fusion or Parallel. I really don't like to dual-boot again. Yen-Ju > > >> Here are things I can talk about: > >> > >> - Theming and status of Narcissus > > We need someone to clean Camaelon code :-) > > >> - Status of new font (Ikarus) > >> - Shirt designs and costs > >> - LiveCD sleeve/label designs > >> - New site > > > > Looking forward to it. > > So do I. > > >> - Stability of CoreObject > > > > Quentin and I both need to say some things about this. Quentin will > > also talk about EtoileUI. > > That's perhaps the most important stuff. > > >> - New runtime > > > > I'd rather postpone this until after FOSDEM. > > Ah ok. I thought you were going to try to finish a first prototype :-) > May it's more reasonable, yet it could be interesting to discuss it at > FOSDEM (perhaps in a dev room talk). > > >> - i18n > > > > Definitely. Anyone interested in working on i18n please see if you > > can attend. > > I'm not convinced it's really important right now, but if people are > motived to tackle this task, that's great. > > >> - Likelihood of producing a LiveCD > > > > I think we should for FOSDEM, so the question should be 'how' more > > than 'if.' > > The problem isn't 'if' or 'how' but rather 'who' ;-) > The livecd building scripts are pretty good right now. I would say 80% > complete. What remains to be done is relatively easy but time- > consuming: thoroughly testing and tuning sh scripts. I could finish it > but EtoileUI and CoreObject sounds more critical to me than the > livecd. Moreover I'm not a good sh programmer, someone more expert at > sh programming should be able to carry it through pretty quickly. > > >> - Who's presenting what? > >> - What will make for a sexy demo? > > > > Both important topics. I have a few ideas, which I'll talk more about > > on Wednesday, > > CoreObject + EtoileUI have been built for sexy demos from the ground > up ;-) > I have more precise ideas but I'm not sure to be ready in time. I may > miss both a new runtime and Magritte-like support. > > There are some other points I would to discuss: > - cleaning Camaelon and EtoileWildMenus (both contributes to the > unpolished feeling given by the environment at this time) > - cleaning and improving System (to have rock-solid session code and > be ready for project session support) > > In addition, we should probably discuss writing some preliminary UI > layout guidelines and control sizes to quickly get rid of our present > exotic variations at this level. > I may come up with other stuff to discuss, that's all I can think for > now. > > Cheers, > Quentin. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Etoile-dev mailing list > Etoile-dev@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev > _______________________________________________ Etoile-dev mailing list Etoile-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
