On 2 Mar 2010, at 19:54, Truls Becken wrote: > Smells like a compiler bug, I guess. David?
Clang uses the ObjC 2 rules for protocols; they should either be empty (forward-declared), in which case they will be resolved at load time, or their definitions should match. This is to prevent two modules from declaring different protocols of the same name and breaking after testing for protocol conformance. You should not ever adopt a protocol that is only forward-declared. This will break introspection with the old ABI and cause all sorts of irritating problems. With the new runtime, if you adopt a forward-declared protocol then the runtime will try to fix up its definition to match the real definition one, if it can. David -- Send from my Jacquard Loom _______________________________________________ Etoile-dev mailing list Etoile-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
