Forwarding because Mark isn’t subscribed: Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
Von: Mark Heily <m...@heily.com<mailto:m...@heily.com>> Betreff: Aw: libBlocksRuntime weak symbols Datum: 25. Februar 2014 14:10:46 MEZ An: Niels Grewe <niels.gr...@halbordnung.de<mailto:niels.gr...@halbordnung.de>> Kopie: "etoile-dev@gna.org<mailto:etoile-dev@gna.org>" <etoile-dev@gna.org<mailto:etoile-dev@gna.org>> This was an oversight on my part; I simply forgot to upload a new version after making the changes. I will tag a new release that includes the weak symbols and upload it to Debian this week. Thanks for reminding me about this issue. On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Niels Grewe <niels.gr...@halbordnung.de<mailto:niels.gr...@halbordnung.de>> wrote: Hi Mark, I’m not sure you remember, but ages ago we discussed having the block copy/release symbols from libBlocksRuntime (_Block_copy and _Block_release) exported as weak symbols to ease interoperability with the GNUstep Objective-C runtime. I was always under the impression that this change had transpired into some of your libBlocksRuntime releases, but I just checked the libBlocksRuntime version in the debian repository and this doesn’t seem to be the case. I’m wondering why and was hoping that you could shed some light on this. Thanks, Niels
_______________________________________________ Etoile-dev mailing list Etoile-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
