On 4/30/07, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 30 avr. 07 à 23:27, Yen-Ju Chen a écrit : > > > On 4/30/07, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Author: qmathe > >> Date: Mon Apr 30 22:36:47 2007 > >> New Revision: 1802 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/etoile?rev=1802&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Fixed XWindowServerKit compilation with gnustep-make version older > >> than 2.0 (see bug #8806 for more explanation) > > > > This fix actually breaks the XWindowServerKit with gnustep-make 2.0. > > In order to reduce the troubles, > > I really suggest people to use gnustep-make 2.0. > > I will try to take a look at it today. Does PopplerKit compiles with > gnustep-make 2.0? I used exactly the same trick to fix it few weeks ago.
I found that I can fix it by putting an aggregate.make in front of etoile.make even though there is no subproject in XWindowServerKit. I think you may want to revise etoile.make since gnustep-make 2.0 automatically create symbolic link to expose libraries and headers. Some of the function of etoile.make may be redundant with gnustep-make 2.0. In short, etoile.make was designed to solve the dependencies issues. If the issues do not exist in gnustep-make 2.0, then there is no need of etoile.make I doubt that is the case, but I think there are some redundancy between etoile.make and gnupste-make 2.0. It is just my wild guess. Yen-Ju > > Quentin. > > > _______________________________________________ > Etoile-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss > _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
