On 8/3/07, Andreas Höschler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Yen-Ju, > > > It gets icon from _NET_WM_ICON, which works on Firefox and > > OpenOffice. > > After that, it caches the icon for later use. > > So most of modern x window applications should work, > > except something like xterm, xcalc, xclock. > > I just fired up /opt/firefox/firefox in a terminal session. The > application comes up fine (Version 1.0). In AZDock appears one gray > icon with a question mark. AZDock logs out nothing when the application > is started!? Why can't I see the firefox icon. Is my firefox two old?
Then I think something is not right here in AZDock. How about other regular GNOME application ? They should work fine. If you look at "AZXWindowApp.m" line 135 of 269, it use XWindowIcon() in XWindowServerKit, which is at "XFunctions.m" line 65 of 565. If it cannot get _NET_WM_ICON, it will complain. Maybe you can play with that and see. Yen-Ju > > > I have a local copy of AZDock which try to support old x window > > applications. > > But any modern x window applications should work fine. > > I can upload the AZDock into trunk later. > > Thanks! I would like to try that. > > > Regarding to two empy icons, I guess StarOffice secretly > > create an invisible x window. That's why it shows up in AZDock. > > This non-freedesktop-compliant application has to be handle > > case-by-case. > > Hmmh!? > > OK, when I fire up soffice I get two icons, when I fireup swriter I get > only one. That's fine. Unfortunately ti sicon is also gray with a > question amrk. May be your trunk version helps. > > Thanks a lot, > > Andreas > > > _______________________________________________ > Etoile-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss > _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
