GNU/Linux 2.6.18-4-686 No funny business in the path name.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Truls Becken <[email protected]>wrote: > Justin Lolofie wrote: > > >> > Etoile/Frameworks/UnitKit/Source/FrameworkSource/UnitKit.framework/libUnitKit.so > > > > No, that file doesnt exist in that location: > > > > UnitKit.framework$ pwd > > /.../Etoile/Frameworks/UnitKit/Source/FrameworkSource/UnitKit.framework > > UnitKit.framework$ ls > > ./ ../ Headers@ Resources@ Versions/ > > > > It does however, exist elsewhere: > > > > A$ pwd > > > /.../Etoile/Frameworks/UnitKit/Source/FrameworkSource/UnitKit.framework/Versions/A > > A$ ls -l UnitKit > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 j x 13 2009-03-19 11:10 UnitKit -> libUnitKit.so* > > A$ ls -l libUnitKit.so > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 j x 15 2009-03-19 11:10 libUnitKit.so -> libUnitKit.so.1* > > A$ ls -l libUnitKit.so.1 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 j x 17 2009-03-19 11:10 libUnitKit.so.1 -> > libUnitKit.so.1.3* > > Ok, so the library compiled and linked correctly, but not all symlinks > were created. I'm not sure what is supposed to make those, frankly. > Anyone? > > Also, it's a little peculiar that the version is "A". Here it's 1, > which is the major version of the framework. > > Does the path to the working copy by any chance have spaces in it? > What operating system is this, by the way? > > -Truls > > _______________________________________________ > Etoile-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
