>"Jake Mercatoris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From what I have been told (so this may not be 100% accurate), stay away > > from the Soundblaster and/or Turtle Beach cards, both of which do > > unnecessary resampling. > >The Turtle Beach Fiji does bit-for-bit transfers from DAT. I think the card >in question when it came to resampling was the SoundBlaster Live 512 and the >SoundBlaster Live 512 Value (which I have and do not use for DAT > HD >transfers). I am a member of dankseeds and the folks there who do DAT > HD >with TB Fiji have claim it to perform bit-for-bit transfers with little or >no errors.
I think it was the old TB Montego II that got the bad rap for resampling like the SB Live! I've never seen the Fiji slammed for the same thing. But I ain't no expert on such things....leading to the next question..... What do our resident techies think of the latest iteration of the Zoltrix Nightingale? Is that still considered an acceptable non-resampling low-budget digi transfer card? w _______________________________________________ etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree
