***** I think that is the whole idea behind EAC's CD database (note: I'm not talking about the CDDB database that stores and downloads disc and track names automatically)...so you use a known "standard" to measure your offset instead of measuring it with a disc that you assume is correct but may not be.
Also, FWIW, Andre lives in Europe. Alot of the CD's in that database are the European releases of common commercial CDs...so, the title may be the same, but it may not be recognized by EAC as one of the reference CDs. Rama At 12:30 PM -0500 3/4/02, Jake Mercatoris wrote: >I HIGHLY RECOMMEND testing and configuring your own offsets, rather than >relying on that reported in this database. If you do that, be sure to use something that has been properly tracked. I was pulling my hair out when I tried to do that for my burner. Different tracks seemed to want different offsets and the numbers I used didn't work right (e.g. a track was off by -11... I'd put in an offset of +11 and subsequently it would be off by +533 or something). Then I tried a different show and the procedure worked like a charm. Turned out the first show was not split on sector boundaries. -- Mark _______________________________________________ etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree Need help? Ask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree Need help? Ask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
