I burn shns at 24 X and have never had a problem.
Jay
Dan Greuel wrote
>
> I always burn my SHN discs at 8x, and I have never
had a problem.
> The MD5s always check out, so I believe that
everything is pure.
>
> In my opinion, if you can get SHNs that pass the MD5
checks at higher
> speeds, it is a waste of time to burn at 1x.
>
> -dan
>
> On Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 11:55 AM, Jonathan
Dodson wrote:
>
> > Hello my friends...
> > I have a quick question for the wise. What speed
should I be burning my
> > shns at? I use Nero and I have been burning at 1X
or 2X because I read
> > somewhere that this reduces any chance of messing
up the md5 check. I
> > just tried burning at 10X ~ then checked with the
md5 off of etree ~
> > everything checked out great. Was this a freak
occurrence? I always
> > burn {no multisession}, {DAO}, and {finalize the
disc}. Am I wasting
> > time burning at 1X? I just want to keep it pure!
> > Any way, y'all are great ~ have a wonderful day!
> > _-^
> > JJ
> > WOB > the first to reply with "davey" in the
subject gets dmb99-7-17 as
> > a u/l or bnp
> >
> > {>^~*rev*~^<}
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://db.etree.org/~jjdodson
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree
> >
> > Need help? Ask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree
>
> Need help? Ask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree
Need help? Ask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
