On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 06:18:04PM -0800, Randolph Fritz wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 06:02:02PM -0800, Rob Hudson wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. On one system, I had 4 ifcfg-lo files, for the purposes of
> > setting up virtual hosts for web testing, so each has it's own IP,
> > and each IP mapped to a host for apache.
> >
> > On the other system, I had it setup up with a single IP, with apache
> > dealing with each virtual host via the httpd.conf file.
> >
> > Which would be better to use?
>
> If you're referring to the loopback address, at least 127.0.0.1 had
> better exist; things will probably break if it doesn't. You might be
> able to have extra loopback addresses, but that's really weird; I
> think I'd go with the second.
Okay. Either way works. The single lo is a little easier, so
that works out.
Thanks,
Rob.
