On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 01:25:39PM -0800, Rodney Mishima wrote: > Greg, > > You are the second person that had told me that Win2k Advanced Server > requires a multi-processor box. Someone at the MS event told me that a > dual-processor or better box would be desirable; but not necessarily > required. I have personally seen that a Dell PentiumII-266 w. 64 MB of RAM is > not enough. Perhaps, two or more single CPU boxes in a cluster would be > viable(and more readily available for testing)? > I don't think that Win2000 or any windows version can be linked up to provide clustering like you are thinking Linux can (the exception being for web serving and possibly database transaction processing, although the latter would get pretty complicated fairly quickly.) greg k-h
- Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 Rodney Mishima
- Re: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 Jim Darrough
- RE: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 RonL
- Re: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 Greg KH
- RE: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 RonL
- Re: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 Rodney Mishima
- Re: Captain Picard ...Win2k AS + dual CPU box Rodney Mishima
- Re: Captain Picard ...Win2k AS + dual CPU box Dennis Soper
- Free ISPs in Eugene and Corvallis Greg KH
- Free ISPs in Eugene and Corvallis Rodney Mishima
- Re: Free ISPs in Eugene and Corvallis Edward Craig
- Re: Free ISPs in Eugene and Corva... Rodney Mishima
- Re: Free ISPs in Eugene and C... Edward Craig
- RE: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 Smith, Mike
- Re: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 Rodney Mishima
- RE: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 Smith, Mike
- RE: Captain Picard endorses Windows 2000 Smith, Mike
