> Slackware or Soft Landing (SLS) for historians
>                       SLS was the first Linux distribution I used.
>                       As far as I know, it was the first distribution
>                       and hasn't been updated in years.
>                       It was rather buggy; but it was very important,
>                       because it made Linux easy to get and install.
>                       (Well, not by today's standards, but by the
>                       standards of 1992/93.)
>                       Slackware came out after SLS, and was a great
>                       improvement.  It was basic, but it was a quality
>                       distribution.  Unfortunately, it fell behind
>                       Redhat, Caldera, SuSE, and the others; and I
>                       stopped using it.  Slackware is still around
>                       and is regularly updated.  Since I no longer
>                       use it, I don't know how the current version
>                       compares to other major distributions.

I have only used Slakeware for the past 5 years. I think you would be
impressed with it today. One big advantage is that it is always current,
where you must wait months for the major names to get a new release out.
It is simple and complete.

-- 
***

Reply via email to