I've been using a 2.3.99pre9 kernel for a while now,
with absolutely NO problems, I guess I should update
soon though : )
-ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"slide" to www.euglug.org in lake'ch, my kin... 4 Ix
Finally, I (this text) would be delighted to be included, in whole or in
part, in your next discussion of self-reference. With that in mind,
please allow me to appologize in advance for infecting you.
<rant cut, available in archive>
> > shipped in February, and Linux 2.4 hasn't. And it's why I won't
> > wait for Service Pack 3 before I install Linux 2.4.
>
> Linux 2.4 test kernels are often quite stable... because of the very
> release early ideals. The 'final' kernel release will be when it's ripe,
> regardless of the commericial pressure (and there is some now).
...
>
> > I would like to know how commercial open source projects handle this
> > dilemma. They have the same incentives to deliver crap as commercial
> > software, it's just more obvious when they do.
Yea, let's have a thread on this? I have 2 profs who are very
interested in this problem.
...
> very neat. CVS is really lacking for some things....
Seth (others too?), what do you want cvs to do?
I've used it for 3 projects, just the basic command-line
tool w/ options, but notice thatadd-ons like
sourceforge itself, and emacs frontends add a lot
of usefulness...
I've been noting-but-pleased with it, and wonder what else
I'd want from it...
