Oh, this is sooo funny! I had to looked it up myself! Check out
http://www.internic.net/cgi-bin/whois?whois_nic=microsoft.com
At 04:01 PM 10/25/00 -0700, Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>bash-2.04$ whois microsoft.com
>
>Whois Server Version 1.3
>
>Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
>with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
>for detailed information.
>
> Server Name:
>MICROSOFT.COM.IS.SECRETLY.RUN.BY.ILLUMINATI.TERRORISTS.NET
> IP Address: 170.1.75.143
> Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
> Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
> Referral URL: www.networksolutions.com
>
>
>
> Server Name: MICROSOFT.COM.IS.RULED.BY.HACKERJACK.COM
> IP Address: 194.236.34.121
> Registrar: DOMAININFO AB
> Whois Server: whois.domaininfo.com
> Referral URL: www.domaininfo.com
>
>
>
> Domain Name: MICROSOFT.COM
> Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
> Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
> Referral URL: www.networksolutions.com
> Name Server: DNS4.CP.MSFT.NET
> Name Server: DNS5.CP.MSFT.NET
> Name Server: DNS7.CP.MSFT.NET
> Name Server: DNS6.CP.MSFT.NET
> Updated Date: 29-sep-2000
>
>
>>>> Last update of whois database: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:07:30 EDT <<<
>
>The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .ORG, .EDU domains and
>Registrars.
>
>
>Found InterNIC referral to whois.networksolutions.com.
>
>The Data in Network Solutions' WHOIS database is provided by Network
>Solutions for information purposes, and to assist persons in obtaining
>information about or related to a domain name registration record.
>Network Solutions does not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a
>WHOIS query, you agree that you will use this Data only for lawful
>purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this Data to:
>(1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
>unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail
>(spam); or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
>that apply to Network Solutions (or its systems). Network Solutions
>reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting
>this query, you agree to abide by this policy.
>
>Registrant:
>Microsoft Corporation (MICROSOFT-DOM)
> 1 microsoft way
> redmond, WA 98052
> US
>
> Domain Name: MICROSOFT.COM
>
> Administrative Contact:
> Microsoft Hostmaster (MH37-ORG) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Microsoft Corp
> One Microsoft Way
> Redmond, WA 98052
> US
> 425 882 8080
> Fax- - - .: 206 703 2641
> Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
> MSN NOC (MN5-ORG) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Microsoft Corp
> One Microsoft Way
> Redmond, WA 98052
> US
> 425 882 8080
> Fax- PATH
> Billing Contact:
> Microsoft-Internic Billing Issues (MDB-ORG)
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Microsoft Corp
> One Microsoft Way
> Redmond, WA 98052
> US
> 425 882 8080
> Fax- �vxt
>
> Record last updated on 29-Sep-2000.
> Record expires on 03-May-2010.
> Record created on 02-May-1991.
> Database last updated on 24-Oct-2000 16:49:02 EDT.
>
> Domain servers in listed order:
>
> DNS4.CP.MSFT.NET 207.46.138.11
> DNS5.CP.MSFT.NET 207.46.138.12
> DNS6.CP.MSFT.NET 207.46.138.20
> DNS7.CP.MSFT.NET 207.46.138.21
>
>bash-2.04$
>
>Franklin Hays wrote:
>
>> take a look at
>>
>> whois microsoft.com
>>
>> catch it while you can... :-)
>>
>> /frank
>
>--
>"I was on a Boston to New York shuttle flight that gets stuck on the runway
for 3 hours
>with no explanation. Worse, I'm sitting in front of three idiot consultants
from Razorfish
>who spend the whole time talking loudly and incessantly. Remarkably, not
one word of it
>resembled any productive activity in the slightest. 'So, I conducted a
series of group
>discussion sessions to quantify how they establish their procedures.' 'But,
Bianca, how
>did you formulate the framework for evaluating their paradigms?'
> My favorite line - Bianca is irate because a client asked her for
some concrete
>bit of information: 'Can you believe that? Hello? I'm an Information
Architect, not a
>Knowledge Engineer!'" --dump() on slashdot
>
>
