On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:02:30AM -0700, Bob Miller wrote: > Patrick R. Wade wrote: > > > >I am becoming a djbdns zealot. > > > > What a damn shame it's Closed Source <grins, ducks and runs> > > djbdns is closed source? In what way? The source is published > at http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.tar.gz; are there use > restrictions that violate the Open Source Definition? > I would call it Closed Binary. It can't be redistributed in binary form if it does not operate exactly as it was designed to. So to distribute it in binary form, linux/unix distributions would have to use /service, and /service can't be a symlink. At least that's my understanding of the issue. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
