On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:59:37AM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:

> > I usually install from source without making packages.  My system
> > doesn't even know I have a kernel:
> > jakemsr@nodge:~$ dpkg -l |grep kernel
> > ii  kernel-package 7.37           Debian Linux kernel package build scripts.
> > ii  mkrboot        0.91           Make a kernel + rootimage bootable from one 
> > ii  pciutils       2.1.8-2        Linux PCI Utilities (for 2.[123].x kernels)
> 
> Mine is similar...
> 
> ii  kernel-image-2 1              Linux kernel binary image for version 2.2.19
> ii  kernel-package 7.34           Debian Linux kernel package build scripts.
> ii  pciutils       2.1.8-2        Linux PCI Utilities (for 2.[123].x kernels)
> 
> Except I did a make-kpkg kernel_image for the linux kernel, and the
> did a dpkg -i kernel_image.deb and so it shows up there.  But if
> debian comes out with kernel-image-2.2.20 later on, it will try to
> overwrite mine, right?  This happened to me when potato updated it's
> kernel and I was still running 2.2.18.  I had to Ctrl-c out of the
> apt-get upgrade.  :(
>
The Debian policy on kernels is probably explained in the Debian 
Policy Manual -> apt-get install debian-policy.  I admit, I do not
know the policy.
Perhaps you can build a new kernel, uninstall the kernel deb, then
install your new kernel.  I don't think I've run into anything other 
than kernel modules that had dependencies on the kernel package.  
There is a file somewhere that allows one to set preferences on how
to treat updates for packages.  You can essentially put a "hold" on
any package.  Unfortunately, I forgot where this file is :(  I got
this info from the debian-dpkg mailing list, where it was posted a
couple weeks ago.  Perhaps a search of the archives would turn up 
something?

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

Reply via email to