cable modems are also firewalls correct? your ip address (public) will be on 
the cable modem, but your computers will be on a private network (10.0.0.x, 
192.168.x.x, ...). So, if the cable modems are like the DSL modems, 
connecting to your IP will not get you your computer, rather your modem. Ive 
never configed a cable modem, but if done many dsl modems (I have 2 that 
arent even being used...) and to set them up to use your dyn-ip, you have to 
forward ports from your public ip to  one (or more) of your private ip's. If 
you only have one computer, you can forward all ports to your computer, and 
your dsl modem(router) becomes invisable. Can you do that sort of thing with 
a cable modem?

Jamie

On Thursday 24 May 2001 08:37 am, you wrote:
> As long as he is connected, he has an ip address.  I have a static.  Others
> may have a dhcp which likely won't change for a long time.  Just get the
> ip, then access it like any of the other 2^32 - 1  ip addresses out there.
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:21:32AM -0700, Bob Crandell wrote:
> > He talked about running GoldMine remotely.  There may be another program
> > too.  I don't think he cares so much about remote administration.
> >
> > The part I'm most interested in is @home.  What does it take to get to an
> > inside computer for anything.  I'm just using VNC as an example.  He may
> > end up using pcAnywhere or some such yuck.
> >
> > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/2001 7:51:27 AM >>>
> >
> > On Thu, 24 May 2001, Bob Crandell wrote:
> > > We got a call from a guy yesterday who wants to access his office
> > > computer while he is out of town.  What is involved with getting in
> > > from the outside through @home? He is running Win98 on one computer and
> > > Win2K on the other.
> > > Let's use VNC as an example.
> > > He is leaving Monday and it would be nice if we could have something in
> > > place by then.
> >
> > is cygwin available for win2k? that way you could have sshd to serve as a
> > transport. Or you could go with BackOrifice, name notwithstanding it's
> > supposed to be a fairly effective remote admin tool for windows.

Reply via email to