Aug 25 (when Linux was announced) is the 4th Saturday.  Should there be a Linux
party?  :)

Some people were asking about Linux's birthday.  Linus posted this:

...

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Benedict Torvalds)
Subject: Birthday (was Re: Uptime found.  Thanks to all)
Date: 31 Jul 92 22:15:20 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(Duperval Laurent) writes:
>
>P.S.  BTW, noone answered yet:  when is Linux's birthday?  Let's have a
>party!

I couldn't for the life of me remember when it all happened, and I don't
keep a diary, so I can't give you any exact dates for when linux "was
born".  But I did start to wonder, so I started ftp'ing around for
archives of the comp.os.minix group (where I announced it), and this is
what I came up with (with some editing). 

This is just a sentimental journey into some of the first posts
concerning linux, so you can happily press 'n' now if you actually
thought you'd get anything technical. 

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Benedict Torvalds)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
> Subject: Gcc-1.40 and a posix-question
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 3 Jul 91 10:00:50 GMT
> 
> Hello netlanders,
> 
> Due to a project I'm working on (in minix), I'm interested in the posix
> standard definition. Could somebody please point me to a (preferably)
> machine-readable format of the latest posix rules? Ftp-sites would be
> nice.

The project was obviously linux, so by July 3rd I had started to think
about actual user-level things: some of the device drivers were ready,
and the harddisk actually worked.  Not too much else. 

> As an aside for all using gcc on minix - [ deleted ]

Just a success-report on porting gcc-1.40 to minix using the 1.37
version made by Alan W Black & co.

>               Linus Torvalds          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> PS. Could someone please try to finger me from overseas, as I've
> installed a "changing .plan" (made by your's truly), and I'm not certain
> it works from outside? It should report a new .plan every time.

So I was clueless - had just learned about named pipes.  Sue me.  This
part of the post got a lot more response than the actual POSIX query,
but the query did lure out arl from the woodwork, and we mailed around
for a bit, resulting in the Linux subdirectory on nic.funet.fi. 

Then, almost two months later, I actually had something working: I made
sources for version 0.01 available on nic sometimes around this time. 
0.01 sources weren't actually runnable: they were just a token gesture
to arl who had probably started to despair about ever getting anything. 
This next post must have been from just a couple of weeks before that
release. 

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Benedict Torvalds)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
> Subject: What would you like to see most in minix?
> Summary: small poll for my new operating system
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 25 Aug 91 20:57:08 GMT
> Organization: University of Helsinki
> 
> 
> Hello everybody out there using minix -
> 
> I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
> professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones.  This has been brewing
> since april, and is starting to get ready.  I'd like any feedback on
> things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
> (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
> among other things). 
> 
> I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. 
> This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and
> I'd like to know what features most people would want.  Any suggestions
> are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-)
> 
>               Linus ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
> PS.  Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. 
> It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never
> will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(. 

Judging from the post, 0.01 wasn't actually out yet, but it's close. I'd
guess the first version went out in the middle of September -91. I got
some responses to this (most by mail, which I haven't saved), and I even
got a few mails asking to be beta-testers for linux.

After that just a few general answers to quesions on the net.

Reply via email to