Linus likes tulip cards, but admits some are flaky...

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Torvalds)
>Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.development.system
>Subject: Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?
>Date: 8 May 1999 20:10:35 GMT
>In article <0EXY2.11020$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>bryan  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>my tulip card is totally unreliable.  I can bring it down with an ftp
>>xfer (local lan) at 10 or 100, in a minute or less.  network hangs and
>>will NOT be reset by software.
>
>I would recommend the intel eepro100, although I also wonder whether you
>just have a flaky tulip card, because tulip would have been my second
>suggestion. There's a lot of different tulip-based cards out there..
>
>A 3c509 should be fine too, although with SMP it needs one of the
>current v2.2 pre-patches to be stable in some configurations (thanks to
>Andrea for figuring out why). 
>
>               Linus

At 09:31 PM 8/12/2001 -0700, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I found the Linksys card LNE100TX (tulip based) for $10, so I went
>with that one.  It worked with the stock 2.2.20preX, and also with the
>latest drivers from scyld.
>
>I was getting ~5 Megabytes / sec on a samba transfer on my local
>network.  I'm assuming some of that is b/c it has to deal with the
>samba stuff.
>
>What is the issue with tulip?
>
>-Rob
>
>> On 20010812.1322, Bob Miller said ...
>>
>> Rob Hudson wrote:
>> 
>> > I'm reviewing 10/100 NIC cards this morning.  I'm looking for a PCI
>> > based 10/100 NIC of good quality for a Linux machine.
>> 
>> 100 Mbit Ethernet is a commodity.  Any card will work fine.  You
>> can pay a premium for the 3Com or Intel name, if you want to.
>> 
>> I've successfully used:
>> 
>>      Intel   eepro100
>>      RealTek 8139
>>      DEC     tulip (real and clones)
>>      3com    3c59x
>> 
>> Seth and Mike have an issue with the tulip -- something about the
>> driver not reinitializing right on a soft reboot, but I do not know
>> the details.
>> 
>> Stan has Realtek-based cards for $20.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Bob Miller                              K<bob>
>> kbobsoft software consulting
>> http://kbobsoft.com                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to