We decided on anarchic organisation when we launched eug-lug to
avoid infighting, and it's mostly worked.
That Linux itself is anarchic in organisation is relevent.
That some eugluggers are also anarchists is OK, after all, if we
can put up with Greens, Republicans, even Democrats, why not anarchists?
Yeah, we have hippies on board, and faux-hippies and dreadlocked
deadheads, skinheads, punks and buttoned-down preppies, even suits.
Anarchists will automatically reject ANY authority's definition of
anarchy, even another anarchist's on (almost any) occasion.
The only principle I've seen all anarchists reject is that anybody
has a right to followers. Although followers may form up behind a leader,
they're free to bug out at the followers' whim.
As are eugluggers.
--
Ed Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Taxi (I need an income) GNU/Linux (I can afford a Free OS)
Think this through with me, let me know your mind... Hunter/Garcia
